Green Bay Packers vs Bengals Match Player Stats: Josh Jacobs and Jordan Love Lead Packers to Victory
Cincinnati’s offense stayed silent for a full half, and that hole was too deep to climb out of. If you’re searching for the complete green bay packers vs bengals match player stats, the short version is this: Green Bay’s ground game and a clutch fourth quarter answered every push Joe Flacco’s Bengals debut threw at them. Below is the full breakdown — box score, quarter-by-quarter scoring, and every meaningful player stat line from Lambeau Field.
Packers vs Bengals Final Score and Game Recap
Green Bay hosted Cincinnati on Sunday, October 12, 2025, at Lambeau Field in front of 78,277 fans, and the Packers left with a 27-18 win that pushed their record to 3-1-1. The Bengals, playing their first game with newly acquired quarterback Joe Flacco under center, fell to 2-4 despite a spirited second-half rally.
Green Bay controlled the first thirty minutes almost entirely, riding a Lucas Havrisik field goal and a Josh Jacobs touchdown run to a 10-0 halftime lead built on a defense that held Cincinnati scoreless. The Bengals found their rhythm after the break, cutting the gap to three points in the third quarter, but Jacobs’ second rushing touchdown and a Jordan Love-to-Tucker Kraft strike restored a two-score cushion.
Ja’Marr Chase’s fourth-and-goal touchdown and a two-point conversion briefly made it a one-score game with just over four minutes left, but Havrisik’s second field goal of the day and a missed 56-yard attempt by Evan McPherson sealed it for Green Bay.
Match Overview Table
| Information | Match Details |
| Event | NFL Week 6, 2025 Regular Season |
| Game | Cincinnati Bengals at Green Bay Packers |
| Date | Sunday, October 12, 2025 |
| Venue | Lambeau Field, Green Bay, Wisconsin |
| Attendance | 78,277 |
| Winner | Green Bay Packers |
| Final Score | Packers 27, Bengals 18 |
| Broadcast | CBS |
Core Match Statistics Overview
Neither team’s official first-down or time-of-possession totals were the deciding factor here — the story was efficiency through the air and a Packers rushing attack that Cincinnati never solved. Adding up each team’s individual production from the green bay packers vs bengals match player stats sheet paints a clear picture.
| Metric | Packers | Bengals |
| Total Net Yards | 412 | 274 |
| Passing Yards | 259 | 219 |
| Rushing Yards | 153 | 55 |
| Turnovers | 1 (INT) | 0 |
| Sacks Allowed | 1 | 1 |
| Completions/Attempts | 19/26 | 29/45 |
Green Bay Packers Rushing Attack
- Josh Jacobs alone outgained the entire Bengals backfield by more than 50 yards on the ground.
- Green Bay spread rushing touches across six different players, which kept Cincinnati’s front guessing on early downs.
Cincinnati Bengals Passing Volume
- Flacco threw 45 times in his Bengals debut, nearly double Love’s attempt total, a sign Cincinnati was playing from behind for most of the second half.
- Despite the high volume, the Bengals’ 29-of-45 clip translated to a modest 4.9 yards per attempt.
Jordan Love Efficiency vs Bengals Defense
- Love needed just 26 attempts to produce 259 yards, a per-attempt average nearly double Flacco’s.
- His only real mistake was a tipped-ball interception in the first quarter that Cincinnati failed to convert into points.
Ja’Marr Chase Target Share
- Chase drew 12 targets, more than double any other Bengals pass catcher, and turned them into 10 catches.
- His fourth-and-goal touchdown was the single biggest offensive play of the Bengals’ rally.
Period-by-Period Analysis
First Quarter: Scoreless Defensive Standoff
| Team | Q1 |
| Bengals | 0 |
| Packers | 0 |
- Green Bay drove into Cincinnati territory early but a tipped-pass interception by Geno Stone erased the threat.
- The Packers defense forced a three-and-out on the ensuing Bengals possession.
- Field position stayed tilted toward Green Bay, but neither offense found the end zone.
Second Quarter: Packers Build a 10-0 Cushion
| Team | Q2 |
| Bengals | 0 |
| Packers | 10 |
- Lucas Havrisik, signed just a day earlier after Brandon McManus’ quadriceps injury, calmly drilled a 43-yard field goal.
- Jordan Love found Josh Jacobs on a checkdown that turned into a 29-yard gain, setting up a short touchdown run.
- Cincinnati’s offense managed only one first down all quarter as the Packers defense dictated the pace.
Third Quarter: Bengals Answer Back
| Team | Q3 |
| Bengals | 7 |
| Packers | 0 |
- Cincinnati strung together a 17-play, 10-plus-minute drive that finally produced a touchdown on fourth-and-goal to Tanner Hudson.
- Green Bay’s offense stayed patient on the ensuing possession, chewing clock but coming away empty as the quarter ended.
- The long Bengals scoring drive flipped the field-position battle for the first time all game.
Fourth Quarter: Jacobs and Kraft Seal It
| Team | Q4 |
| Bengals | 11 |
| Packers | 17 |
- Josh Jacobs’ second rushing touchdown of the day, a 14-yarder, pushed the lead back to ten.
- Cincinnati answered with a field goal, but Tucker Kraft’s touchdown catch made it a two-score game again at 24-10.
- Chase’s touchdown and a two-point conversion briefly cut the gap to six before Havrisik’s 39-yard field goal and a missed Bengals kick closed the book.
Green Bay Packers Player Statistics
Jordan Love (QB): 19/26, 259 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 101.3 rating. Love spread the ball to five different receivers and avoided the kind of second-half mistakes that could have let Cincinnati back into the game entirely.
Josh Jacobs (RB): 18 carries for 93 yards and 2 TD, plus 5 catches for 57 yards. Jacobs finished with 150 yards from scrimmage while reportedly playing through flu-like symptoms, and his two rushing scores were the difference-makers on the ground.
Matthew Golden (WR): 3 catches for 86 yards on 5 targets. The rookie’s 31-yard fourth-quarter grab kept the clock-killing final drive alive when Green Bay needed a first down most.
Romeo Doubs (WR): 5 catches for 55 yards on 9 targets. Doubs was Love’s most frequent target and moved the chains on several third-down conversions underneath.
Tucker Kraft (TE): 2 catches for 43 yards and a touchdown. Kraft’s 19-yard score came on a broken-tackle run after the catch that pushed Green Bay’s lead back to two scores.
Cincinnati Bengals Player Statistics
Joe Flacco (QB): 29/45, 219 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 90.9 rating in his Bengals debut. Flacco engineered two scoring drives against a defense that had shut him out for thirty minutes, including a clutch fourth-down touchdown throw to Chase.
Ja’Marr Chase (WR): 10 catches for 94 yards and a touchdown on 12 targets. Chase was the engine of Cincinnati’s comeback bid, drawing more than a quarter of the team’s total targets.
Tee Higgins (WR): 5 catches for 62 yards on 8 targets. Higgins’ 19-yard grab on third-and-6 helped extend the drive that produced Cincinnati’s first touchdown.
Chase Brown (RB): 9 carries for 42 yards, plus 2 catches for 7 yards and a two-point conversion reception. Brown was the closest thing Cincinnati had to a ground-game threat, though he was held under 5 yards per carry.
Statistical Leaders Summary Table
| Category | Packers | Bengals |
| Leading Scorer | Josh Jacobs (2 rush TD) | Ja’Marr Chase (1 rec TD) |
| Passing Leader | Jordan Love (259 yds) | Joe Flacco (219 yds) |
| Receiving Leader | Matthew Golden (86 yds) | Ja’Marr Chase (94 yds) |
| Rushing Leader | Josh Jacobs (93 yds) | Chase Brown (42 yds) |
Why the Packers Won
Balanced Offensive Production
Green Bay didn’t lean on one player to carry the offense. Jacobs handled the scoring, Love spread completions across five targets, and Golden’s big fourth-quarter catch came from a receiver who’d totaled just two touches before that snap.
| Stat | Packers |
| Players with 40+ receiving/rushing yards | 4 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 2 |
| Turnovers committed | 1 |
First-Half Defensive Shutdown
Holding Cincinnati scoreless through two quarters, including an interception and multiple three-and-outs, put the Packers ahead of the chains for the rest of the afternoon.
Special Teams Reliability
Havrisik, signed only a day before kickoff, went 2-for-2 on field goals, while McPherson’s missed 56-yarder in the final minute closed the door on any Bengals hope.
Why the Bengals Lost
Slow Start Erased by Individual Brilliance
Cincinnati’s offense produced zero points across the first thirty minutes, a deficit that even Chase’s 94-yard, one-touchdown day couldn’t fully erase.
Heavy Dependence on Chase and Higgins
Chase and Higgins combined for 17 of the Bengals’ 29 completions and 156 of their 219 passing yards, leaving little margin when the rest of the receiving corps was quiet.
Missed Field Goal at the Worst Moment
McPherson’s 56-yard attempt sailed wide right with 46 seconds left, and it was the last real chance Cincinnati had to extend the game.
Historical Context and Advanced Insights
Season Series and Head-to-Head Context
Green Bay and Cincinnati have met 14 times dating back decades, with Cincinnati holding a narrow all-time edge before this game. The 2025 meeting was their only regular-season matchup for the year.
| Prior Meeting Context | Note |
| All-time series (before 2025 game) | Bengals lead 7-6 |
| Most recent meeting | This October 12, 2025 game |
Assist-to-Attempt and Efficiency Insights
Love’s 259 yards on just 26 attempts produced a 9.96 yards-per-attempt figure, well above Flacco’s 4.9 yards-per-attempt on his 45 throws. That gap in efficiency, not raw attempt volume, was the real separator in this green bay packers vs bengals match player stats comparison — Cincinnati moved the ball steadily but needed nearly twice as many plays to do it.
What This Means for the Packers
- A 3-1-1 start keeps Green Bay near the top of the NFC North with confidence in Jacobs’ health-defying performance.
- Havrisik’s clean 2-for-2 kicking debut answers a real question at a position that had been unsettled by injury.
- Love’s low-mistake, high-efficiency day builds momentum heading into a tougher part of the schedule.
What This Means for the Bengals
- Flacco’s debut showed enough accuracy to be competitive, but Cincinnati needs more from receivers beyond Chase and Higgins.
- A fourth straight loss drops the Bengals to 2-4 and adds pressure on the defense to limit big first-half deficits.
- The missed 56-yard effort raises more concerns about special teams dependability, especially at kicker.
Key Lessons From This Game
- A dominant first half can be enough to survive a strong second-half rally if the lead is built early.
- Spreading touches across multiple skill players makes an offense harder to defend than leaning on one or two stars.
- Efficiency per attempt often matters more than total pass attempts when comparing quarterback performances.
- Depending too heavily on one or two receivers creates a ceiling that shows up against disciplined defenses.
- Short-notice roster moves, like signing a kicker a day before kickoff, can still produce reliable results.
- Field position swings from long, clock-eating drives can flip a game’s momentum even without points on the board.
FAQs
Who won the Packers vs Bengals game?
The Green Bay Packers won 27-18 over the Cincinnati Bengals on October 12, 2025, at Lambeau Field.
What were Jordan Love’s stats against the Bengals?
Love completed 19 of 26 passes for 259 yards with 1 touchdown and 1 interception, finishing with a 101.3 passer rating.
How many touchdowns did Josh Jacobs score?
Jacobs scored 2 rushing touchdowns and totaled 150 yards from scrimmage on 18 carries and 5 catches.
What were Joe Flacco’s stats when he first joined the Bengals?
Flacco went 29-of-45 for 219 yards with 2 touchdowns, no interceptions, and a 90.9 passer rating.
How many catches and yards did Ja’Marr Chase have?
Chase caught 10 passes for 94 yards and a touchdown on 12 targets.
What was the attendance at Lambeau Field for this game?
The game drew 78,277 fans to Lambeau Field.
Conclusion
Green Bay’s win came down to spreading production across multiple players rather than depending on any single star, paired with a defense that erased thirty minutes of the game before Cincinnati found any rhythm.
Chase’s brilliance and Flacco’s efficient debut gave the Bengals a puncher’s chance, but Jacobs’ two touchdowns, Love’s clean decision-making, and a reliable kicking performance were enough to hold off the late push.






